Iran says ‘Muslim Nato’ pact reflects retreat from US security umbrella

Tehran has played down concerns over a new mutual defence pact between Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan, while portraying the agreement as evidence of declining regional reliance on the United States.

Issued on:




1 min Reading time

Iran’s foreign ministry said Monday that a defence pact signed last week between Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan was “a sign of a change in the perception” of countries in the region towards the United States.

“The countries of the region have realised that security is not a commodity that can be bought from false brokers,” said ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei at a weekly press conference, referring to the US, an ally of the three signatories to the pact.

“Countries in the region cannot rely on the claim of security provided by the US as in the past,” he added.

He also said Iran was not concerned that the pact could be aimed at Tehran, highlighting “deep religious, historical and civilisational ties” with Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan.

How a regional reset has left isolated Iran fighting to stay relevant

There was “no reason to worry that this treaty will be against Iran”, Baqaei said.

The three nations signed the agreement – the “Mecca Mutual Defense Agreement” – on Friday against the backdrop of a five-month war between the US and Iran, which has drawn in surrounding nations and disrupted regional shipping routes.

Mutual defence

Pakistan’s foreign ministry said Friday that the pact meant an attack on any member would be regarded as an attack on all, adding it was “intended to strengthen collective deterrence”.

Analysts have said it seeks to deter an emboldened Iran and offset an unreliable United States.

According to a joint statement issued by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey, the pact “stipulates that any armed attack against any one of the three states shall be regarded as an attack against them all” – language reminiscent of Nato’s Article 5.

(with newswires)



Source link

Leave a Reply