Close

Why the Climate Warming Goal of 1.5 Degrees C Isn’t a Lost Cause—Even If We Overshoot It

Global warming is set to exceed 1.5 degrees Celsius soon, meaning the world will most likely fail to meet the 2015 Paris Agreement goal of striving to cap the average temperature increase at 1.5 degrees C. Even if Earth warms more than that, though, this key aim isn’t a lost cause. Scientists say we could bring the global temperature back down again if we redouble our efforts. The concept of overshoot—to miss our mark but then return below it—offers both a warning and a path forward.

The warning is stark: even if we reduce warming to 1.5 degrees C sometime before century’s end, some losses will be irreversible. Ecosystems will be transformed, species will vanish and vulnerable communities will bear lasting scars. Nevertheless, ensuring that the overshoot of 1.5 degrees C is only temporary would curtail the damage and offer some chance of recovery.

Studies indicate that if we limit peak warming to well below two degrees C, there will still be some hope of bringing the temperature down in the future by removing far more carbon from the atmosphere than we emit, an approach called net-negative emissions. Simply achieving net-zero emissions—a major goal of many industrial countries—is no longer sufficient to limit warming to 1.5 degrees C.


On supporting science journalism

If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


Admitting that we will exceed this threshold doesn’t justify delaying action; it demands acceleration. Every tenth of a degree of warming beyond 1.5 degrees C will cause more damage to Earth and people and make it more difficult for us to return to that level while adapting to a changing climate. It’s a challenging prospect, but at this point it may be our least bad option for limiting long-term climate harm.

LIMITING BY HOW MUCH WE EXCEED 1.5°C REMAINS CRITICAL

Exceeding 1.5°C of global warming will result in greater impacts on humans and ecosystems.

EVEN THOUGH WE WILL EXCEED 1.5°C, WE COULD BRING TEMPERATURE BACK DOWN AGAIN IF THE OVERSHOOT IS NOT TOO HIGH

Overshoot is a trajectory in which global temperature first exceeds a given threshold and later returns below it. The less overshoot we experience, the better.

A series of of 5 panels show a line growing over time in a parabolic shape, like an upside down U.

OVERSHOOT CAN BE CHARACTERIZED BY HOW MUCH AND FOR HOW LONG 1.5°C IS EXCEEDED

By how much and for how long depends on the trajectory of net-negative CO₂ emissions, as well as emissions from other greenhouse gases.

Net carbon dioxide emissions over time is shown for two illustrative overshoot pathways. When CO2 drops down to zero, global temperature is projected to stop rising. When human activities remove more CO2 from the atmosphere than they emit, global temperatures start declining again.

A WORLD THAT RETURNS TO GLOBAL WARMING OF 1.5°C WILL BE A SIGNIFICANTLY ALTERED AND MORE DAMAGED WORLD

Some climate-related damage to humans and ecosystems will be irreversible, and some could be partially reversed with significant delay.

Three panels include examples of irreversible damages (coastal hazard, sea-level rise, loss of polar ice, species extinction), delayed reversible damages (food insecurity, crop failure, ecosystem transformation) and reversible near-term damages (heat waves, mortality from heat waves, storms, droughts, flooding.)

BRINGING GLOBAL WARMING BACK DOWN IN AN OVERSHOOT PATHWAY WOULD BE A COMPLEX PROCESS

The shape of that pathway will be informed by overarching conversations that reveal key tensions and forces at play—including answers to the questions below.

A bold overshoot curve—mimicking the first curve at the top of this article—includes many faint fluctuating variations on that curve. Four questions are superimposed: Do the benefits of bringing temperature back down outweigh the costs? Does thinking about overshoot change anything about mitigation policies in the near term? Is removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere a critical need compared with reducing ongoing emissions, or is it a distraction? Could efforts to reverse global warming harm finance and support for adaptation?

Angela Morelli and Tom Gabriel Johansen/InfoDesignLab; Source: “Overshoot: A Conceptual Review of Exceeding and Returning to Global Warming of 1.5 °C,” by Andy Reisinger, Jan S. Fuglestvedt, Anna Pirani et al., in Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 50; April 14, 2025 (reference)

Source link

Related Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *